RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jul 5 08:59:42 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112221.html

On 2/07/2011 5:16 PM, I wrote:

> Given [the C implementation] is now ahead of the Python
> reference impl, I wonder if we should just drop all wording about that
> reference impl and just treat the C impl as canonical?

I'm looking to update the PEP based on this discussion - does anyone 
object to the above?  Or to put it another way, does anyone believe 
dropping the Python reference implementation is to the detriment of the PEP?

Thanks,

Mark

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112221.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation