A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112216.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation

[Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementationVinay Sajip vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Jul 5 01:19:39 CEST 2011
One more thing about associations - we've got pyw.exe for Python.NoConFile
and py.exe for Python.file, but how do we handle Python.CompiledFile? It
doesn't really make sense to have the association not handled by the launcher.
Unfortunately, of course, both pyw and py compile to pyo, so we don't know
which launcher to use. It is, of course, easy for either py or pyw to
determine which version of python is to be used to invoke a .pyc - just not
which Windows variant.

BTW just as a test I implemented .pyc support in the C implementation - it
works fine apart from the "python.exe or pythonw.exe?" question.

Regards,

Vinay Sajip

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4