2011/1/31 anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> techtonik at gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> I see no reason for b.p.o bureaucracy. >> >> It provides a place for discussion, and makes it easier to coordinate >> multiple efforts. > > Code review system provides a better space for discussion if we are > speaking about simple code cleanup. To me polluting tracker with the > issues that are neither bugs nor feature requests only makes bug > triaging process and search more cumbersome. If it's not a bug or a feature request, why does it need to change? -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4