RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jan 31 23:58:30 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-January/107819.html

2011/1/31 anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:45:45 +0000
>> techtonik at gmail.com wrote:
>>> I see no reason for b.p.o bureaucracy. Mercurial-style workflow [1] is
>>> more beneficial to development as it doesn't require switching from
>>> console to browser for submitting changes.
>>
>> Ok, why don't you contribute to Mercurial instead?
>
> If you don't want to receive a stupid answer, why don't you read the
> link and say what you don't like in this approach in a constructive
> manner?

As I understand it, there used to be patches at python.org. I'm not sure
why this was discontinued, so perhaps someone more senior should chime
in. :)

-- 
Regards,
Benjamin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-January/107819.html below:

[Python-Dev] Mercurial style patch submission (Was: MSI: Remove dependency from win32com.client module (issue4080047))