On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:50:18 +0200 anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:45:45 +0000 > > techtonik at gmail.com wrote: > >> I see no reason for b.p.o bureaucracy. Mercurial-style workflow [1] is > >> more beneficial to development as it doesn't require switching from > >> console to browser for submitting changes. > > > > Ok, why don't you contribute to Mercurial instead? > > If you don't want to receive a stupid answer, why don't you read the > link and say what you don't like in this approach in a constructive > manner? Very simple: I don't want to be spammed with tons of patches, patch reviews, and issue comments. Also, I want the history of issue discussions to be easily accessible from permanent, issue-specific URLs, rather than search through mailing-list archives to understand why a change was made. I appreciate that you refrained from giving a stupid answer, however.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4