"Martin v. Löwis", 24.01.2011 21:17: > If the string is created directly with the canonical representation > (see below), this representation doesn't take a separate memory block, > but is allocated right after the PyUnicodeObject struct. Does this mean it's supposed to become a PyVarObject? Antoine proposed that, too. Apart from breaking (more or less) all existing C subtyping code, this will also make it harder to subtype it in new code. I don't like that idea at all. Stefan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4