> > Incidentally, to slightly reduce the overhead the unicode objects, > > there's this proposal: http://bugs.python.org/issue1943 > > I wonder what aspects of this patch and discussion should be integrated > into the PEP. The notion of allocating the memory in the same block is > already considered in the PEP; what else might be relevant? Ok, I'm sorry for not reading the PEP carefully enough, then. The patch does a couple of other tweaks such as making "state" a char rather than an int, and changing the freelist algorithm. But the latter doesn't need to be spelled out in a PEP anyway. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4