A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-January/107590.html below:

[Python-Dev] What's new 2.x in 3.x docs.

[Python-Dev] What's new 2.x in 3.x docs. [Python-Dev] What's new 2.x in 3.x docs.Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Sat Jan 22 20:04:00 CET 2011
The 3.x docs mostly started fresh with 3.0. The major exception is the 
What's new section, which goes back to 2.0. The 2.x stuff comprises 
about 650KB in the repository and whatever that translates into in the 
distribution. I cannot imagine that anyone who only has 3.x and no 2.x 
version would have any interest in the 2.x history. And of course, the 
complete 2.x history will always be available with the latest 2.7.z. And 
the cover page for 3.x could even say so and include a link. So why not 
remove it from the 3.2 release (and have two separate pages for the 
online version)?

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4