On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:44, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Le lundi 10 janvier 2011 à 19:37 +0000, Michael Foord a écrit : > > On 10/01/2011 19:31, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > Le lundi 10 janvier 2011 à 19:26 +0000, Michael Foord a écrit : > > >>> > > >>> Fair enough. I will remove it. > > >>> > > >> Well, *often* a test that exposes the issue can be written - and if so > > >> it is a useful exercise (surely). > > > Yes, well, that's a matter of "useful exercise for the contributor" vs. > > > "required to advance on the issue". AFAICT the "stage" field aims at > > > conveying the latter piece of information (the current wording says > > > "unit test *needed*"). > > > > Aren't we discussing the dev guide? Discussion about tracker field is > > that away <-----. > > Oh, well. I think we're discussing the directions that a contributor > willing to help triage could give so to advance an issue. I hope I'm not > mistaken. The doc has already been tweaked on my machine, so there is no need to continue this discussion. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110111/2fbf0666/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4