A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-January/107384.html below:

[Python-Dev] "unit test needed"

[Python-Dev] "unit test needed" [Python-Dev] "unit test needed"skip at pobox.com skip at pobox.com
Mon Jan 10 21:37:29 CET 2011
    Antoine> Then we would need a whole array of checkboxes for things
    Antoine> missing in a patch:
    Antoine> - missing unit test
    Antoine> - missing documentation changes
    Antoine> - other things?

How about replacing all the possibilities with

    patch incomplete

then elaborate in the issue itself how that is the case.

    Antoine> I don't think it's useful. As for "tests are simpler", it
    Antoine> really depends on the issue :) I've worked on many issues where
    Antoine> writing the test took much more time than actually fixing the
    Antoine> bug (one-line fix vs. careful test setup to exercise the fix).

I would rather write event-driven code than the test cases for it. ;-)

Skip
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4