On 10/01/2011 19:31, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le lundi 10 janvier 2011 à 19:26 +0000, Michael Foord a écrit : >>> >>> Fair enough. I will remove it. >>> >> Well, *often* a test that exposes the issue can be written - and if so >> it is a useful exercise (surely). > Yes, well, that's a matter of "useful exercise for the contributor" vs. > "required to advance on the issue". AFAICT the "stage" field aims at > conveying the latter piece of information (the current wording says > "unit test *needed*"). Aren't we discussing the dev guide? Discussion about tracker field is that away <-----. Michael > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4