A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-January/107230.html below:

[Python-Dev] Omit Py_buffer struct from Stable ABI for Python 3.2?

[Python-Dev] Omit Py_buffer struct from Stable ABI for Python 3.2? [Python-Dev] Omit Py_buffer struct from Stable ABI for Python 3.2?Mark Dickinson dickinsm at gmail.com
Wed Jan 5 13:55:55 CET 2011
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently [1], the implementation and the documentation for PEP 3118's
> Py_buffer struct don't line up (there's an extra field in the
> implementation that the PEP doesn't mention).

I think there are actually two such fields:  smalltable and obj.

The need for obj is a little ugly:  as far as I can tell, it's
meaningless for a 3rd-party object that wants to export buffers---it's
only really used by the memoryview object and by internal Python
types.

Mark
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4