A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-January/107229.html below:

[Python-Dev] Omit Py_buffer struct from Stable ABI for Python 3.2?

[Python-Dev] Omit Py_buffer struct from Stable ABI for Python 3.2? [Python-Dev] Omit Py_buffer struct from Stable ABI for Python 3.2?Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed Jan 5 13:31:11 CET 2011
Currently [1], the implementation and the documentation for PEP 3118's
Py_buffer struct don't line up (there's an extra field in the
implementation that the PEP doesn't mention).

Accordingly, Mark and I think it may be a good idea to leave this
structure (and possibly related APIs) out of the stable ABI for the
3.2 release. I don't *think* it needs changing, but I'm not 100%
certain until we finish working through the problem and realign the
implementation and documentation. Applications and extension modules
that use this interface would still work - they would just have to
wait until 3.3 before they could consider migrating to the stable ABI.

Regards,
Nick.

[1] http://bugs.python.org/issue10181

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4