RetroSearch Browse

Mon Feb 28 20:58:56 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-February/108463.html

Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 13:56 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
> 2011/2/28 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>:
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:36:11 -0500
> > Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +  an existing branch.  The pusher then has to merge the superfetatory heads
> >>
> >> 'superfetatory'? I have no idea of what this is, neither does
> >> merriam-webster.com ;-).
> >
> > There are some Google hits, though... Not sure if they are of people
> > making the same mistakes as I do ;)
> 
> Endly, perhaps it will be adopted. Did you mean "superfluous" though?

I really meant superfetatory (it's slightly different: superfluous is
simply useless, while superfetatory implies that it's in excess).

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-February/108463.html below:

[Python-Dev] r88676 - peps/trunk/pep-0385.txt