A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-February/108431.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] hooks: Fix checkbranch hook

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] hooks: Fix checkbranch hook [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] hooks: Fix checkbranch hookNick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sun Feb 27 08:48:34 CET 2011
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:26 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> There is nothing that prevents people from tagging the tree currently
> in subversion, but most of the time, only the release manager does any
> tagging.
>
> If you think that it's a likely problem that people create named
> branches by mistake, then we should have a hook.

I suspect the concern is that people may create named branches locally
as part of their own workflow, then mistakenly push those branches
instead of collapsing back to a single commit against the relevant
line of development.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4