> Actually, it isn't *required* on each developer's setup, since we > now have a hook that refuses bogus changegroups (if needed, we can even > refuse individual changesets). In most situations, even without the > eol extension line endings won't get modified anyway. I think this is overly optimistic. Visual Studio will break all your files if you don't use that extension (and you actually use it to modify source code). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4