On 27 February 2011 01:40, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > >> Would it be possible to name "trunk" as "2.x" instead? Otherwise I > >> could see people getting confused and asking why trunk was closed, > >> and/or not the same as "default". > > > > Problem is, you then have 1.5.2 released from the 2.x branch :) > > In that case, "legacy-trunk" would seem clearer. +1 Exactly what I was about to suggest. Tim Delaney -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110227/b6306821/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4