On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Le samedi 26 février 2011 à 08:38 -0800, Daniel Stutzbach a écrit : > > Can we just get rid of "trunk" altogether? It's history is a strict > > subset of the 2.7 branch's history, isn't it? > > Named branches are exclusive, they can't be a subset of each other ;) > (in other words: 2.7 starts where trunk stops; trunk changesets are > strict ancestors of 2.7) > Maybe I don't fully understand how Mercurial branches work or how it defines terminology (in fact, that is likely :) ). What's the difference between the statement "trunk changesets are strict ancestors of 2.7" and the statement "trunk's history is a strict subset of 2.7's history"? -- Daniel Stutzbach -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110226/470555f0/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4