On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Would it be possible to name "trunk" as "2.x" instead? Otherwise I > could see people getting confused and asking why trunk was closed, > and/or not the same as "default". > Can we just get rid of "trunk" altogether? It's history is a strict subset of the 2.7 branch's history, isn't it? -- Daniel Stutzbach -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110226/283fc013/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4