A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-February/108348.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88526 - in python/branches/release32-maint/Lib: collections.py test/test_collections.py

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88526 - in python/branches/release32-maint/Lib: collections.py test/test_collections.py [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88526 - in python/branches/release32-maint/Lib: collections.py test/test_collections.pyNick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Feb 26 16:16:42 CET 2011
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Éric Araujo <merwok at netwok.org> wrote:
> Isn’t this considered a new feature, unsuitable for 3.2?  (I mean no
> disrespect, I just want to understand better what kind of changes can go
> in each type of branch.)

collections._ChainMap itself is private, so changes can be made to its
API even in a maintenance branch.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4