On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: >> Would it be possible to name "trunk" as "2.x" instead? Otherwise I >> could see people getting confused and asking why trunk was closed, >> and/or not the same as "default". > > Problem is, you then have 1.5.2 released from the 2.x branch :) In that case, "legacy-trunk" would seem clearer. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4