On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: .. > I don't think it's a good idea to backport visible API changes. > (someone successfully compiling on 2.7.N could then have users > complaining that compilation fails on 2.7.N-1). > Moreover, it doesn't really fix a bug. That was the argument that I voiced http://bugs.python.org/issue1699259#msg119032, but I cannot really think of the code that would be broken by changing the type of an API function *argument* from char * to const char *. Given that 2.7 is an odd-ball with extended maintenance period, I am not sure "it doesn't really fix a bug" argument is dispositive. I am still -0 on backport, however.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4