On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:07:17 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > While this is definitely untidy, it doesn't strike me as a release > blocker. More of a "fix it in 3.2.1", since the status quo will > *work*, it just means the precompiled file will be ignored on first > execution with newer Python versions. Are you sure? If the package gets installed in a root-writable-only directory, later execution cannot create the right pyc files. This certainly looks like a critical issue (hopefully not release blocker).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4