On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Éric Araujo <merwok at netwok.org> wrote: >> Well, it's no good to keep using CVCS terms and mislead users. That the >> "checkout" is not a checkout but a full repository is about the most important >> fact about a hg (or any DVCS) clone. > > Well, to really use the Mercurial terms, what you have when you get > stuff from a remote server to your disk is a clone, which contains a > full repository and may contain a working copy (also called checkout). And that's the proper way to describe this. > IOW, “check out” is used with Mercurial, as a synonym for “update”, an > operation from the (local) repo to the working directory; the > CVCS-inspired mistake is to use that to refer to an operation from a > remote server to the local disk (“clone”, “pull”). HTH Exactly. -- anatoly t.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4