A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-February/108003.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposal / Questions about OrderedDict literals and/or faster C implementation

[Python-Dev] Proposal / Questions about OrderedDict literals and/or faster C implementation [Python-Dev] Proposal / Questions about OrderedDict literals and/or faster C implementationXavier Morel catch-all at masklinn.net
Fri Feb 11 10:06:57 CET 2011
On 2011-02-10, at 21:47 , Éric Araujo wrote:
> Ideas are usually discussed first on python-ideas to assess usefulness,
> get the pulse of the community, beat the API into shape and such things
> before coming up to python-dev.  (A number of core devs are on both lists.)
> 
> You may want to search the mail archive for all the previous threads
> about adding a C version and literal notation for ordered dicts.

Indeed, there's been a discussion on this very subject not three weeks ago: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2011-January/009037.html

I'm guessing this request is going to get more common for some time, as people are getting aware Ruby switched its Hash implementation to an ordered dict in 1.9 (well they didn't exactly switch anything around, they added back and next pointers to their dict cells)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4