On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 05:26, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 12:13:08 -0800 > Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: >> > >> > We could perhaps present SVN-like "work in the working copy" workflow >> > (without local commits), and let seasoned hg users choose other >> > workflows they like more (they don't need our help anyway). >> >> I would rather give people some simple workflow that has some benefit >> over svn. Basically whatever is the easiest to comprehend and work >> with should be what we start people with. > > Ok, I've updated the devguide to present a simple named branch-based > approach. I'm not sure it is our job to *explain* hg features, so I've > just given a couple of minimal instructions to get people on track. Yep, what you wrote is what I was thinking. Enough so people can get up and going and at least a taste of what hg can do for them w/o devolving into an hg tutorial. -Brett > > Regards > > Antoine. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4