On 30 December 2011 06:59, Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com> wrote: > +0 to exposing the salt as a constant (3.3+ only) - or alternatively > expose a hash function that just takes an existing hash and returns the > salted hash. That would make it very easy for anything that wanted a salted > hash to get one. > Sorry - brain fart on my part there - the salt needs to be included right from the start. Tim Delaney -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111230/fed6ebb5/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4