On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:32:44 +0000 > Mark Shannon <mark at hotpy.org> wrote: > > > > > per-instance attributes, it just forces them all to keep resizing up, > > > even though individual instances would be small with the current dict. > > There is a cut-off point, at the moment it's quite unsophisticated about > > how it does this, but it could easily be improved. > > Suggestions are welcome. > > Can you open an issue on the bug tracker? > There you can either give your repo URL, or upload a patch. > Both should allow to start reviewing the code :) > > Regards > > Antoine. > +1 I'm interested in seeing this as well. Anything that improves the memory overhead in cpython is appreciated as it decreases the pain when moving an app from 32bit to 64bit. :) -gps -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111221/4696c35c/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4