Greg Ewing wrote: > Mark Shannon wrote: > >> I have a new dict implementation which allows sharing of keys between >> objects of the same class. > > We already have the __slots__ mechanism for memory savings. > Have you done any comparisons with that? > You can't make Python programmers use slots, neither can you automatically change existing programs. Are you suggesting that because the __slots__ mechanism exists, the dict implementation doesn't have to be efficient? > Seems to me that __slots__ ought to save even more memory, > since it eliminates the per-instance dict altogether rather > than just the keys half of it. > Of course using __slots__ saves more memory, but people don't use them much. Cheers, Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4