Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-December/114953.html below:

[Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:28:31 +0100
"Laurence Rowe" <l at lrowe.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> The approach that most people seem to have settled on for porting  
> libraries to Python 3 is to make a single codebase that is compatible with  
> both Python 2 and Python 3, perhaps making use of the six library.

Do you have evidence that "most" people have settled on that approach?
(besides the couple of library writers who have commented on this
thread)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4