On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Ben Wolfson wrote: > > I personally would prefer (1) to (2) or (3), and (3) to (2), had I my > druthers, but it doesn't matter a *whole* lot to me; I'd prefer any of > them to nothing (or to changing the docs to reflect the current batty > behavior). > > > +1 on changing the batty behavior. Skimming my comments from last time this came up, +1 on just going with what the docs say. The PEP underspecified it, so taking the docs as the spec for this aspect seems like a reasonable course of action. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4