On 12/10/2011 9:25 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > On Dec 10, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: >> A little data: the HTML5lib project lives at >> https://code.google.com/p/html5lib/ >> It has 4 owners and 22 other committers. If there really are 4 'owners' rather than 4 people with admin access to the site, then there are 4 people to negotiate with. >> The most recent release, html5lib 0.90 for Python, is nearly 2 years >> old. Since there is a separate Python3 repository, and there is no >> mention on Python3 compatibility elsewhere that I saw, including the >> pypi listing, I assume that is for Python2 only. > > I believe that you are correct. There are issues pointing to a 1.0 release, but I could not find any current timetable. The project lots a bit stagnant. That does not bode well for a commitment to future active maintenance. >> A comment on a recent (July 11) Python3 issue >> https://code.google.com/p/html5lib/issues/detail?id=187&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Milestone%20Owner%20Summary%20Port >> <https://code.google.com/p/html5lib/issues/detail?id=187&colspec=ID >> Type Status Priority Milestone Owner Summary Port> >> suggest that the Python3 version still has problems. "Merged in now, >> though still lots of errors and failures in the testsuite." > > I don't see what bearing this has on the discussion. I think both points above show that 'absorbing HTML5Lib in the stdlib' will involve more sociological and technical problems than doing so with a active one-person module that already runs on 3.2. One is that the multiple version Python 2.x codebase is the reference version and that will not be incorporated. A serious plan will have to address the real situation. --- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4