Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> writes: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Cedric Sodhi <manday at gmx.net> wrote: > > > IF YOU THINK YOU MUST REPLY SOMETHING WITTY, ITERATE THAT THIS HAD > > BEEN DISCUSSED BEFORE, REPLY THAT "IT'S SIMPLY NOT GO'NNA HAPPEN", > > THAT "WHO DOESN'T LIKE IT IS FREE TO CHOOSE ANOTHER LANGUAGE" OR > > SOMETHING SIMILAR, JUST DON'T. > > Every single response in this thread so far has ignored this request. The request was completely unreasonable. Cedric does not get to unilaterally set restrictions on who and how people respond to a screed in a public forum. > the rest I have to say about the topic would violate the above > request. You have my permission to violate the above request. That should have at least as much authority as the request itself, so you are hereby empowered to respond as you like. -- \ “We can't depend for the long run on distinguishing one | `\ bitstream from another in order to figure out which rules | _o__) apply.” —Eben Moglen, _Anarchism Triumphant_, 1999 | Ben Finney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4