On 12/8/2011 8:31 AM, Philipp A. wrote: > hi devs, > > just an idea that popped up in my mind: re.findall() returns a list of > tuples, where every entry of each tuple represents a match group. > since match groups can be named, we are able to use named tuples instead > of plain tuples here, in the same fashion as namedtuple’s rename works: > misssing group names get renamed to _1 and so on. i suggest to add the > rename keyword option, to findall, defaulting to True, since mixed > positional and named tuples are more common than in usual use cases of > namedtuple. > > do you think it’s a good idea? I have not used named tuples or re.findall (much), so I have no opinion). > finally: should i join the mailing list to see answers? should i file a > PEP? i have no idea how the inner workings of python development are, > but i wanted to share this idea with you :) Ideas like this should either go the the python-ideas list or to the tracker at bugs.python.org as a feature request. If you post to the list, you should either subscribe at mail.python.org or follow it as a newsgroup at news.gmane.org (which is what I do). Posting a tracker issue requires registration of some sort. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4