If people decide to delay their Py3k migrations until they can drop 2.5 support, they're quite free to do so. The only reason for porting right now is to support 3.2, thus making a future reintroduction of u'' useless. Those that delay their ports can use the forward compatibility in 2.6. Having just purged so much cruft from the language, pleas to add some back permanently for a problem that is going to fade from significance within the next couple of years are unlikely to get very far. -- Nick Coghlan (via Gmail on Android, so likely to be more terse than usual) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111208/052981ee/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4