Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-December/114771.html below:

[Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 12/8/2011 1:31 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:

> What's the case against?

 From a 3.x perpective, an irrelevant 'u' would be pure noise and make 
the language a bit harder to learn. The intent for 3.x is that one be 
able to learn 3.x without knowing anything about 2.x. So bridge stuff 
has been put into 2.6 and even more in 2.7. But it does not really 
belong in 3.x.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4