On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>wrote: > 2011/8/30 stefan brunthaler <stefan at brunthaler.net>: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:42, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> > wrote: > >> 2011/8/30 stefan brunthaler <stefan at brunthaler.net>: > >>> I will remove my development commentaries and create a private > >>> repository at bitbucket for you* to take an early look like Georg (and > >>> more or less Terry, too) suggested. Is that a good way for most of > >>> you? (I would then give access to whomever wants to take a look.) > >> > >> And what is wrong with a public one? > >> > > Well, since it does not fully pass all regression tests and is just > > meant for people to take a first look to find out if it's interesting, > > I think I might take it offline after you had a look. It seems to me > > that that is easier to be done with a private repository, but in > > general, I don't have a problem with a public one... > > Well, if your intention is for people to look at it, public seems to > be the best solution. > > +1 The point of open source is more eyeballs and the ability for anyone else to pick up code and run in whatever direction they want (license permitting) with it. :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110830/292f73e6/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4