RetroSearch Browse

Mon Aug 29 21:24:12 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/113306.html

On 8/29/2011 9:00 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2011, at 07:11 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>
>> A PEP should IMO only cover end-user aspects of the new re module.
>> Code organization is typically not in the PEP. To give a specific
>> example: you mentioned that there is (near) code duplication
>> MRAB's module. As a reviewer, I would discuss whether this can be
>> eliminated - but not in the PEP.
>
> +1

I think at this point we need a tracker issue to which can be attached 
such reviews, for safe-keeping, even if most discussion continues here.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/113306.html below:

[Python-Dev] Should we move to replace re with regex?