On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > I wonder if for > this particular purpose SWIG isn't the better match. (If SWIG weren't > universally hated, even by its original author. :-) SWIG is nice when you control the C/C++ side of the API as well and can tweak it to be SWIG-friendly. I shudder at the idea of using it to wrap arbitrary C++ code, though. That said, the idea of using SWIG to emit Cython code rather than C/API code may be one well worth exploring. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4