A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/113216.html below:

[Python-Dev] Should we move to replace re with regex?

[Python-Dev] Should we move to replace re with regex? [Python-Dev] Should we move to replace re with regex?"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Aug 27 21:05:35 CEST 2011
> I disagree.  The first paragraph says this has something to do with new
> keywords.  It doesn't appear to say what we expect users to -do- with
> it.  Both are important.

Well, users can use the new features...

> Is it "You'd better try this, because it's going in eventually.  If you
> don't try it out before it becomes default behavior, you have no right
> to complain"?

No. It's "we have that feature which will be activated in a future
version. If you want to use it today, use the __future__ import. If
you don't want to use it (now or in the future), just don't."

> And if people do complain, what are python-dev's options?

That will depend on the complaint. If it's "I don't like the new
feature", then the obvious response is "don't use it, then".

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4