RetroSearch Browse

Sat Aug 27 02:25:56 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/113161.html

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:48:42 -0700
> Dan Stromberg <drsalists at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Then there probably should be a from __future__ import for a while.
>
> If you are willing to use a "from __future__ import", why not simply
>
>    import regex as re
>
> ? We're not Perl, we don't have built-in syntactic support for regular
> expressions.
>
> Regards
>

If you add regex as "import regex", and the new regex module doesn't work
out, regex might be harder to get rid of.  from __future__ import is an
established way of trying something for a while to see if it's going to
work.

EG: "from __future__ import re", where re is really the new module.

But whatever.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110826/bbe0007e/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/113161.html below:

[Python-Dev] Should we move to replace re with regex?