> - “The UTF-8 decoding fast path for ASCII only characters was removed > and replaced with a memcpy if the entire string is ASCII.” > The fast path would still be useful for mostly-ASCII strings, which > are extremely common (unless UTF-8 has become a no-op?). Is it really extremely common to have strings that are mostly-ASCII but not completely ASCII? I would agree that pure ASCII strings are extremely common. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4