RetroSearch Browse

Mon Aug 15 15:21:43 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/112882.html

Nick Coghlan, 15.08.2011 14:35:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Antoine Pitrou<solipsis at pitrou.net>  wrote:
>> AFAICT, often with True and False:
>>
>>     x = (some condition) ? Py_True : Py_False;
>>     Py_INCREF(x);
>>     return x;
>
> And that's an idiom that works better with a Py_RETURN macro than it
> would separate macros:
>
> Py_RETURN(cond ? Py_True : Py_False);

And that would do what exactly? Duplicate the evaluation of the condition?

Stefan

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/112882.html below:

Add Py_RETURN_NOTIMPLEMENTED macro. Fixes #12724.