On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 05:46:12 -0700 Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think that is worth it. > There is some value to keeping the API consistent with the style that has been used in the past. > So, I vote for Py_RETURN_NOTIMPLEMENTED. There's no real need to factor this any further. > It's not hard and not important enough to introduce a new variation on return macros. Why is Py_RETURN_NOTIMPLEMENTED important at all? Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4