2011/8/10 Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com>: > > On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500, >> Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> a écrit : >>> 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin <brian.curtin at gmail.com>: >>>> Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for >>>> multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move >>>> things in the future >>> >>> Is there some sort of concrete proposal? The PEP just seems to mention >>> it as an idea. >>> >>> In general, -1. I think we don't need to be moving things around more >>> to little advantage. >> >> Agreed. Also, flat is better than nested. Whoever wants to populate the >> concurrent package should work on new features to be added to it, rather >> than plans to rename things around. > > I concur. So we could put yourself, Antoine, and me in the concurrent package. :) Sorry, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4