RetroSearch Browse

Wed Aug 10 22:46:41 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/112785.html

On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

> Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500,
> Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> a écrit :
>> 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin <brian.curtin at gmail.com>:
>>> Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for
>>> multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move
>>> things in the future
>> 
>> Is there some sort of concrete proposal? The PEP just seems to mention
>> it as an idea.
>> 
>> In general, -1. I think we don't need to be moving things around more
>> to little advantage.
> 
> Agreed. Also, flat is better than nested. Whoever wants to populate the
> concurrent package should work on new features to be added to it, rather
> than plans to rename things around.

I concur.

Raymond

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/112785.html below:

[Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package