RetroSearch Browse

Wed Aug 10 22:36:43 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/112783.html

Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500,
Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> a écrit :
> 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin <brian.curtin at gmail.com>:
> > Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for
> > multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move
> > things in the future
> 
> Is there some sort of concrete proposal? The PEP just seems to mention
> it as an idea.
> 
> In general, -1. I think we don't need to be moving things around more
> to little advantage.

Agreed. Also, flat is better than nested. Whoever wants to populate the
concurrent package should work on new features to be added to it, rather
than plans to rename things around.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/112783.html below:

[Python-Dev] Moving forward with the concurrent package