On Aug 10, 2011, at 4:15 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> After implementing the aforementioned step 5, you will find that the performance of everything, including the threaded code, will be quite a bit worse. Frankly, this is probably the most significant obstacle to have any kind of GIL-less Python with reasonable performance. > > PyPy would actually make a significantly better basis for this kind of > experimentation, since they *don't* use reference counting for their > memory management. Jython may be a better choice. It is all about concurrency. Its dicts are built on top of Java's ConcurrentHashMap for example. Raymond -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110810/29aa4b7a/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4