RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 9 09:08:24 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/112763.html

On 8/9/2011 2:02 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Am 09.08.2011 01:35, schrieb Terry Reedy:
>> On 8/8/2011 4:26 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>>>>> With Python 3.1 and Python 3.2.1 it works OK, but with Python 3.2.1 the
>>>>> read returns an empty string (I checked it myself).
>>>>
>>>> http://bugs.python.org/issue12576
>>>
>>> The bug is now fixed. Can you release a Python 3.2.2, maybe only with
>>> this fix?
>>
>> Any new release should also have
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue12540
>> which fixes another bad regression.
>
> I can certainly release a version with these two fixes.  Question is, should
> we call it 3.2.2, or 3.2.1.1 (3.2.1p1)?

I believe precedent and practicality say 3.2.2. How much more, if 
anything is up to you. The important question is whether Martin is 
willing to do a Windows installer, as 12540 only affects Windows.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-August/112763.html below:

[Python-Dev] urllib bug in Python 3.2.1?