Am 09.08.2011 01:35, schrieb Terry Reedy: > On 8/8/2011 4:26 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: >>>> With Python 3.1 and Python 3.2.1 it works OK, but with Python 3.2.1 the >>>> read returns an empty string (I checked it myself). >>> >>> http://bugs.python.org/issue12576 >> >> The bug is now fixed. Can you release a Python 3.2.2, maybe only with >> this fix? > > Any new release should also have > http://bugs.python.org/issue12540 > which fixes another bad regression. I can certainly release a version with these two fixes. Question is, should we call it 3.2.2, or 3.2.1.1 (3.2.1p1)? Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4